🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils could only establish a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create other types of wards – such as rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their wards.