🔗 Share this article

When I am a Dungeon Master, I traditionally shied away from extensive use of randomization during my D&D sessions. I preferred was for story direction and what happened in a game to be determined by player choice as opposed to the roll of a die. However, I decided to alter my method, and I'm very happy with the result.

The Catalyst: Observing 'Luck Rolls'

An influential actual-play show features a DM who regularly calls for "luck rolls" from the participants. This involves choosing a type of die and outlining consequences contingent on the roll. While it's at its core no different from consulting a random table, these get invented on the spot when a character's decision lacks a clear outcome.

I decided to try this approach at my own table, mainly because it looked engaging and presented a change from my normal practice. The experience were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the often-debated balance between planning and randomization in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional Session Moment

In a recent session, my party had just emerged from a city-wide conflict. Later, a player wondered if two key NPCs—a pair—had made it. Rather than deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, a single one would die; on a 10+, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This triggered a profoundly emotional moment where the party found the bodies of their companions, still holding hands in their final moments. The group performed funeral rites, which was particularly powerful due to earlier story developments. As a final gesture, I improvised that the forms were suddenly restored, revealing a magical Prayer Bead. I rolled for, the item's contained spell was exactly what the party lacked to solve another pressing quest obstacle. One just script such magical moments.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This event caused me to question if chance and thinking on your feet are actually the beating heart of tabletop RPGs. Although you are a detail-oriented DM, your skill to pivot may atrophy. Adventurers frequently take delight in derailing the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to pivot effectively and create scenarios in the moment.

Using luck rolls is a fantastic way to develop these skills without venturing too far outside your preparation. The trick is to deploy them for minor decisions that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. As an example, I would not employ it to decide if the central plot figure is a traitor. But, I could use it to decide whether the PCs enter a room moments before a key action takes place.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

Spontaneous randomization also helps keep players engaged and foster the feeling that the adventure is responsive, shaping based on their decisions as they play. It prevents the perception that they are merely pawns in a pre-written story, thereby strengthening the collaborative foundation of roleplaying.

Randomization has historically been integral to the original design. The game's roots were reliant on encounter generators, which fit a game focused on dungeon crawling. While contemporary D&D frequently focuses on plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, it's not necessarily the required method.

Striking the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely no problem with doing your prep. Yet, there is also no problem with letting go and allowing the rolls to guide minor details in place of you. Authority is a big part of a DM's role. We need it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to release it, even when doing so can lead to great moments.

My final recommendation is this: Don't be afraid of temporarily losing your plan. Embrace a little randomness for inconsequential details. It may create that the unexpected outcome is significantly more rewarding than anything you might have pre-written on your own.