🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a latest legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The federal appeals court decided on Tuesday that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded panel of 11 judges. The court also overturned a previous decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent turn in a protracted legal battle over whether the administration has the authority and justification to send national guard forces in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in south Portland were under attack, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have control of the circumstances.

In defiance of descriptions of the city as “war ravaged”, residents have been posting videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing events such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in the city enacted two legal injunctions this month – one blocking the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the deployment of any military personnel in Oregon, after attempts to evade the first order by mobilizing troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – allowing control of state troops – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the physical sending of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration simultaneously – by a panel of eleven justices.

“This ruling demonstrates that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The founding document limits the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the armed forces into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, principles, and autonomy as this legal proceeding progresses and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”