🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, however, may align so closely with the carefully constructed image promoted by official channels that, domestically, it functions as a compliment rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its pop-culture machine have collaborated to forge a tailor-made version of the president. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a television show released last fall, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from disorder. While he is called Mikhail, the implication is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions often end up reinforcing this identical story instead of undercutting it. A new film inspired by a popular book sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is shown as having been chosen by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. Historically, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged Putin to accept the role. The position was effectively a selection process with many candidates. At the centre to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the country in practice.

• His list featured several politicians, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who studied his rise, the future president merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the process stated the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the shift to framing him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by the actor's debut as 007. His harder interpretation prompted local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters swapping Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears directly. His influence is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it might seek to examine.